-
Improvement
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
None
Assume you have a job A that launch a child Job B and that job A has to wait Job B finished to continue its steps.
If you stopped job A while job B is processing, the job B isn't stopped.
It should be stopped.
Precondition:
I have a parent job "Parent" that triggers child jobs "Child(1-N)", and then blocks waiting for them to finish.
Action:
1. Start Parent job.
2. Wait for children to launch.
3. Abort Parent job.
Current result:
Parent job aborts but children continue to run. If the child jobs have no meaning outside of the parent, then child jobs have to be manually aborted.
I can see why you would want this behavior. It is certainly the correct behavior in the "post-build step" case. It is probably correct in the "non-blocking build step" case. In the case of the parent build blocking on children completing, there are definitely scenarios where it is not.
Desired Enhancement:
When "Block on child job completion" checkbox is checked, a list of options is shown. Add option to the list: "Child job action when parent job is aborted". Values: "None, continue running (default)", "Abort immediately".
- is duplicated by
-
JENKINS-27740 Add "Abort downstream jobs" to "Block until finished" build step options
-
- Closed
-
I vote for this issue. At the moment we use the workaroud groovy postbuild script which checks if build has been aborted, then gets the chilren and executes build.doStop() on them.