Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-12437

"Sticky" Checkbox to Claim Failed Builds Following the Current One

    • Icon: Improvement Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • claim-plugin
    • None

      When claiming a "historic" build with the Sticky flag should also claim all subsequent failed builds (stopping at the next passing build or the latest build).

      Basically, assigning a "sticky" claim should be retroactive.

          [JENKINS-12437] "Sticky" Checkbox to Claim Failed Builds Following the Current One

          Phillip Ponzer created issue -
          Phillip Ponzer made changes -
          Priority Original: Major [ 3 ] New: Minor [ 4 ]
          Christian Bremer made changes -
          Assignee New: Christian Bremer [ ki82 ]

          trejkaz added a comment -

          I just put in two hours work going through all the tests for the "latest build" and claiming my tests after confirming that they were mine and then after I finished, I went to the latest build and only 3 of them were still claimed. So yes, I think I can agree with this improvement request.

          trejkaz added a comment - I just put in two hours work going through all the tests for the "latest build" and claiming my tests after confirming that they were mine and then after I finished, I went to the latest build and only 3 of them were still claimed. So yes, I think I can agree with this improvement request.

          I wish this would work with the test failures. There is a checkbox "Sticky" but even for the test failure I claim directly it seems to forget my claim after a while.

          ... and I wonder why in the release notes (https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Claim+plugin) the feature "Option to sticky claim test failures if the failure is "similiar"" is struck through.

          Michael Schaufelberger added a comment - I wish this would work with the test failures. There is a checkbox "Sticky" but even for the test failure I claim directly it seems to forget my claim after a while. ... and I wonder why in the release notes ( https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Claim+plugin ) the feature "Option to sticky claim test failures if the failure is "similiar"" is struck through.

          Marc Carter added a comment -

          [slightly reworded Description]

          It's fairly common pattern for a dev to look at the first build failure and not the latest one to diagnose an issue. They then Claim it and, as mentioned, it does nothing to help the team.
          another common usecase is to open the latest failed build #10, another build #11 runs in the background, then users Claim #10.

          Marc Carter added a comment - [slightly reworded Description] It's fairly common pattern for a dev to look at the first build failure and not the latest one to diagnose an issue. They then Claim it and, as mentioned, it does nothing to help the team. another common usecase is to open the latest failed build #10, another build #11 runs in the background, then users Claim #10.
          Marc Carter made changes -
          Description Original: When claiming a build that is a few failed builds back, clicking the "Sticky" checkbox should also claim the failed builds following the build you are currently claiming. New: When claiming a "historic" build with the Sticky flag should also claim all subsequent _failed_ builds (stopping at the next passing build or the latest build).

          Basically, assigning a "sticky" claim should be retroactive.
          R. Tyler Croy made changes -
          Workflow Original: JNJira [ 142803 ] New: JNJira + In-Review [ 175756 ]
          Arnaud TAMAILLON made changes -
          Link New: This issue is related to JENKINS-26136 [ JENKINS-26136 ]
          Arnaud TAMAILLON made changes -
          Assignee Original: Christian Bremer [ ki82 ] New: Arnaud TAMAILLON [ greybird ]

            greybird Arnaud TAMAILLON
            starryknight64 Phillip Ponzer
            Votes:
            5 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: