Hi,

      I originally posted this on the mailing list but the lack of replies forced me to create this issue. See the post here: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/jenkinsci-users/s1HyARUbfbs

      Is there any way the Perforce plugin can be changed so that it doesn't do the redundant sync? It can be a real performance killer if the view you're syncing to is particularly large.

      Regards,
      Tom.

          [JENKINS-12983] Redundant syncs when using matrix jobs

          Thomas Fields created issue -

          Rob Petti added a comment -

          Not specific to the perforce plugin... I don't really see any reason to be syncing the source code down on the parent job when no 'touchstone' build is being executed, but Jenkins goes ahead and syncs it anyways (presumably to grab changes, but those should be easily retrievable from the children).

          Rob Petti added a comment - Not specific to the perforce plugin... I don't really see any reason to be syncing the source code down on the parent job when no 'touchstone' build is being executed, but Jenkins goes ahead and syncs it anyways (presumably to grab changes, but those should be easily retrievable from the children).
          Rob Petti made changes -
          Component/s New: core [ 15593 ]
          Component/s Original: perforce [ 15506 ]

          Thomas Fields added a comment -

          Thanks for clarifying Rob. Any idea who this issue could be assigned to so the problem is fixed? I'm unclear on this assignment/fix process. From the replies on the mailing list and a quick look in Jira it appears this problem is affecting other users too.

          Many thanks,
          Tom

          Thomas Fields added a comment - Thanks for clarifying Rob. Any idea who this issue could be assigned to so the problem is fixed? I'm unclear on this assignment/fix process. From the replies on the mailing list and a quick look in Jira it appears this problem is affecting other users too. Many thanks, Tom

          Rob Petti added a comment -

          It's already assigned to core, so someone will pick it up from there. I recommend voting on it to give it some more attention.

          Rob Petti added a comment - It's already assigned to core, so someone will pick it up from there. I recommend voting on it to give it some more attention.

          What's even worse is for subversion it seems to sync the entire depo rather than using the exclude directory list, which is taking hours to sync...

          Simon Stevenson added a comment - What's even worse is for subversion it seems to sync the entire depo rather than using the exclude directory list, which is taking hours to sync...

          Thomas Fields added a comment -

          So 7 months further down the line and still no word on this

          Thomas Fields added a comment - So 7 months further down the line and still no word on this
          Rob Petti made changes -
          Assignee New: Kohsuke Kawaguchi [ kohsuke ]

          Thomas Fields added a comment -

          Hi Kohsuke,

          Are there any plans to fix this any time soon?

          Tom

          Thomas Fields added a comment - Hi Kohsuke, Are there any plans to fix this any time soon? Tom

          Thomas Fields added a comment -

          Is this ever going to be fixed?

          Tom

          Thomas Fields added a comment - Is this ever going to be fixed? Tom

            kohsuke Kohsuke Kawaguchi
            tfields Thomas Fields
            Votes:
            20 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            18 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: