It seems to me that forest.py supports creation of a snapshot file that would
retrieve both the open and closed repos in whatever desired tree structure, in
which case the Hudson support could simply be instructed to use a forest with a
specified root. This would seem much preferable to creating an ad-hoc
forest-like system just for Hudson's use. If this is impossible (and forest.py
cannot be improved to make it possible) then the plugin configuration would need
to be more complicated.
This issue is essentially the same as #1143 which was filed earlier.
-
-
- This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 1143 ***
Which is a better interface? Support mercurial forest extension or support for multiple repositories?