Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
Description
When adding "Editable Email Notification" as a post-build action, I am seeing that $DEFAULT_RECIPIENTS is always set in the Project Reply-To List field by default, instead of $DEFAULT_REPLYTO. All the other fields have their $DEFAULT_xxx variables matching their corresponding field, but it looks like there may have been a copy/paste oversight and the wrong default variable is being used for the Reply-To field.
See screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/Ckq1UHl.png
I've tested a fix for this and will submit the diff in a Pull Request on the GitHub project for email-ext.
Attachments
Activity
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Assignee | Stuart Montgomery [ stmontgomery ] | Alex Earl [ slide_o_mix ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Description |
When adding "Editable Email Notification" as a post-build action, I am seeing that $DEFAULT_RECIPIENTS is always set in the Project Reply-To List field by default, instead of $DEFAULT_REPLYTO. All the other fields have their $DEFAULT_xxx variables matching their corresponding field, but it looks like there may have been a copy/paste oversight and the wrong default variable is being used for the Reply-To field. I've tested a fix for this and will submit the diff in a Pull Request on the GitHub project for email-ext. |
When adding "Editable Email Notification" as a post-build action, I am seeing that $DEFAULT_RECIPIENTS is always set in the Project Reply-To List field by default, instead of $DEFAULT_REPLYTO. All the other fields have their $DEFAULT_xxx variables matching their corresponding field, but it looks like there may have been a copy/paste oversight and the wrong default variable is being used for the Reply-To field. See screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/Ckq1UHl.png I've tested a fix for this and will submit the diff in a Pull Request on the GitHub project for email-ext. |
Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
Workflow | JNJira [ 148913 ] | JNJira + In-Review [ 192938 ] |