Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-22001

Do not solve JENKINS-19446 by delivering events asynchronously

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      As I wrote there:

      The current fix is just no good. It delivers events asynchronously, which makes the system unpredictable, and ruins functional tests.
      Better IMHO would be to call just save() asynchronously.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            jglick Jesse Glick created issue -
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue is blocking JENKINS-19446 [ JENKINS-19446 ]
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Assignee Kohsuke Kawaguchi [ kohsuke ] Jesse Glick [ jglick ]
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
            rtyler R. Tyler Croy made changes -
            Workflow JNJira [ 154078 ] JNJira + In-Review [ 194781 ]

              People

              Assignee:
              jglick Jesse Glick
              Reporter:
              jglick Jesse Glick
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: