-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Blocker
This bug appears in the following conditions:
- Client name contains ${EXECUTOR_NUMBER} variable
High-priority issue appears if:
- Concurrent builds are enabled
- No NODE_NAME variable in client name
=> Missing hash in Client name => collisions in workspaces on different nodes
- is related to
-
JENKINS-23467 Streamline the variables handling
-
- Resolved
-
-
JENKINS-25226 Perforce Plugin Substitutes default Parameter Value instead of actual Parameter Value for client name
-
- Resolved
-
- links to
[JENKINS-25559] Missing hash in client names if ClientNameFormat substitution fails
Link |
New:
This issue is related to |
Link |
New:
This issue is related to |
Status | Original: Open [ 1 ] | New: In Progress [ 3 ] |
Remote Link | New: This issue links to "PR #60 (Web Link)" [ 11907 ] |
Assignee | Original: Rob Petti [ rpetti ] | New: Oleg Nenashev [ oleg_nenashev ] |
Resolution | New: Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | Original: In Progress [ 3 ] | New: Resolved [ 5 ] |
Resolution | Original: Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | Original: Resolved [ 5 ] | New: Reopened [ 4 ] |
Summary | Original: Missing hash in client names with EXECUTOR_NUMBER leads to workspace collisions | New: Missing hash in client names if ClientNameFormat substitution fails |
Resolution | New: Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | Original: Reopened [ 4 ] | New: Resolved [ 5 ] |
Workflow | Original: JNJira [ 159531 ] | New: JNJira + In-Review [ 196115 ] |