• Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: Major Major
    • core
    • regression from 1.630 -> 1.633

      as seen in the screenshots below, there is one good (the old version), and one bad (the new version). The build history table now shows an improper sorting, at least for jobs that had existing history with them during the upgrade process.

      Instead of showing the most recent builds at the top, oldest at the bottom, it now has a rather random looking sort to it

      this seems to be caused by the following PR: https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1641

          [JENKINS-30899] Build History order not sorted properly

          Shaun Reich created issue -

          Vass Endre added a comment -

          Same error for me

          Vass Endre added a comment - Same error for me

          Tim College added a comment -

          I have an issue with the Build History section, though it's slightly different - mine are actually in the correct order, but many of the most recent builds are missing.

          For example, in one job, the most recent build is 973 - the most recent shown in the history is 954. In another, the most recent is 1837, but the most recent shown is just 1787.

          Tim College added a comment - I have an issue with the Build History section, though it's slightly different - mine are actually in the correct order, but many of the most recent builds are missing. For example, in one job, the most recent build is 973 - the most recent shown in the history is 954. In another, the most recent is 1837, but the most recent shown is just 1787.

          Jon Vallet added a comment -

          Can confirm, updated from version 1.631 to 1.633.

          Jon Vallet added a comment - Can confirm, updated from version 1.631 to 1.633.
          Jon Vallet made changes -
          Attachment New: Wrong_order.png [ 30840 ]

          Daniel Beck added a comment -

          Assigning to Tom for investigation. We may have to revert the change.

          Daniel Beck added a comment - Assigning to Tom for investigation. We may have to revert the change.
          Daniel Beck made changes -
          Assignee New: Tom FENNELLY [ tfennelly ]

          Tom FENNELLY added a comment -

          Tom FENNELLY added a comment - Revert PR: https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1864

          Tim College added a comment -

          Downgrading to 1.632 solves the "missing a bunch of recent builds" issue I mentioned above.

          Tim College added a comment - Downgrading to 1.632 solves the "missing a bunch of recent builds" issue I mentioned above.
          Tom FENNELLY made changes -
          Link New: This issue depends on JENKINS-30909 [ JENKINS-30909 ]

            tfennelly Tom FENNELLY
            sreich Shaun Reich
            Votes:
            29 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            35 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: