Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-40340

Option to suppress changelong when getting Pipeline Jenkinsfile from GitHub SCM

XMLWordPrintable

      When pulling pipeline script from SCM, there is no way to suppress the changelog which is makes it difficult if not impossible to easily distinguish changelog items between changes to the script file and changes to the actual app source the pipeline is building.

      In this particular case I have a generic pipeline script stored in a controlled GitHub repository along with app specific properties files which are loaded to control what gets executed in the pipeline script. The pipeline script then pulls the actual application source code for the build from within it.

      No need for the changelog of the build to include entries from changes to the generic pipeline script nor the properties files. Only want it to include app code source changes.

          [JENKINS-40340] Option to suppress changelong when getting Pipeline Jenkinsfile from GitHub SCM

          Cory Grubbs created issue -

          Cory Grubbs added a comment -

          Can somebody provide an update/eta on this?

          Cory Grubbs added a comment - Can somebody provide an update/eta on this?
          Cory Grubbs made changes -
          Priority Original: Critical [ 2 ] New: Blocker [ 1 ]

          Cory Grubbs added a comment -

          Is there a problem with this request that is causing it to not be picked up?

          Cory Grubbs added a comment - Is there a problem with this request that is causing it to not be picked up?
          Cory Grubbs made changes -
          Issue Type Original: Improvement [ 4 ] New: Bug [ 1 ]
          Jesse Glick made changes -
          Component/s New: workflow-multibranch-plugin [ 21465 ]
          Component/s Original: workflow-aggregator-plugin [ 21710 ]
          Issue Type Original: Bug [ 1 ] New: Improvement [ 4 ]
          Priority Original: Blocker [ 1 ] New: Major [ 3 ]

          Jesse Glick added a comment -

          Solved implicitly by JENKINS-33273.

          Jesse Glick added a comment - Solved implicitly by JENKINS-33273 .
          Jesse Glick made changes -
          Link New: This issue depends on JENKINS-33273 [ JENKINS-33273 ]

          Cory Grubbs added a comment -

          Please clarify how this is solve implicitly by JENKINS-33273.

          I get that there are 3 checkouts in my current process(1. get the jenkinsfile, 2. get the app specific properties file, 3. get the application source code)

          All I'm looking for is ability to suppress changelog information for the first 2 so that the list of changes in the build ONLY includes changes that have been made to the application source code.

          Cory Grubbs added a comment - Please clarify how this is solve implicitly by JENKINS-33273 . I get that there are 3 checkouts in my current process(1. get the jenkinsfile, 2. get the app specific properties file, 3. get the application source code) All I'm looking for is ability to suppress changelog information for the first 2 so that the list of changes in the build ONLY includes changes that have been made to the application source code.

          Jesse Glick added a comment -

          Only in that currently it does not load a changelog, more by accident than design.

          Jesse Glick added a comment - Only in that currently it does not load a changelog, more by accident than design.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            cgrubbs Cory Grubbs
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: