Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-41609

Dockerfile reuseNode should default argument to true

      See JENKINS-41391. Same idea.

      dockerfile {
          reuseNode()
      }
      

          [JENKINS-41609] Dockerfile reuseNode should default argument to true

          Liam Newman created issue -
          Liam Newman made changes -
          Link New: This issue relates to JENKINS-41391 [ JENKINS-41391 ]

          Andrew Bayer added a comment -

          Nope, sorry. We already had this discussion when we added reuseNode - retaining existing behavior is more important.

          Andrew Bayer added a comment - Nope, sorry. We already had this discussion when we added reuseNode - retaining existing behavior is more important.
          Andrew Bayer made changes -
          Resolution New: Not A Defect [ 7 ]
          Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]
          Liam Newman made changes -
          Comment [ See JENKINS-41391. Same idea.

          {code}
          dockerfile {
              reuseNode()
          }
          {code} ]
          Liam Newman made changes -
          Description New: See JENKINS-41391. Same idea.

          {code}
          dockerfile {
              reuseNode()
          }
          {code}

          Andrew Bayer added a comment -

          whoops, misunderstood

          Andrew Bayer added a comment - whoops, misunderstood
          Andrew Bayer made changes -
          Resolution Original: Not A Defect [ 7 ]
          Status Original: Resolved [ 5 ] New: Reopened [ 4 ]

          Andrew Bayer added a comment -

          ...though I'm gonna WONTFIX this too, because reuseNode() would be syntactically different than everything else in agent - it's always foo bar.

          Andrew Bayer added a comment - ...though I'm gonna WONTFIX this too, because reuseNode() would be syntactically different than everything else in agent - it's always foo bar .

          Liam Newman added a comment -

          Would this break the existing behavior?

          Liam Newman added a comment - Would this break the existing behavior?

            Unassigned Unassigned
            bitwiseman Liam Newman
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: