-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Blocker
-
Jenkins ver. 2.32.2
TestLink Plugin ver. 3.11
TestLink ver. 1.9.16[DEV]
when trying to execute test case job in Jenkins using TAP I will always see Testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and communicate on every build
colored text
perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong?
file name: gui_arguments
content:
1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments
then the result shows this
Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS
but status results are always like this:
TestLink build ID: 3
TestLink build name: 0.10
Total of 1 tests. Where 0 passed, 0 failed, 0 were blocked and 1 were not executed.
List of test cases and execution result status
Test case ID | Test case external ID | Version | Name | Test project ID | Execution status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1113 | OTC-31 | 1 | automatic test test | 1 | Not Run |
any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas.
[JENKINS-41768] testlink status not run with TAP and junit-xml
Description |
Original:
when trying to execute test case job in jenkins using TAP I will always see testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and comunicate on every build perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong? file name: gui_arguments content: {{1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments}} then the result shows this {{Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS}} any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas. |
New:
when trying to execute test case job in Jenkins using TAP I will always see Testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and communicate on every build perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong? file name: gui_arguments content: {{1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments}} then the result shows this {{Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS}} any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas. |
Attachment | New: JENKINS-41768.jpg [ 35802 ] |
Attachment | Original: JENKINS-41768.jpg [ 35802 ] |
Attachment | New: JENKINS-41768.jpg [ 35803 ] |
Attachment | Original: JENKINS-41768.jpg [ 35803 ] |
Attachment | New: JENKINS-41768.jpg [ 35805 ] |
Description |
Original:
when trying to execute test case job in Jenkins using TAP I will always see Testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and communicate on every build perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong? file name: gui_arguments content: {{1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments}} then the result shows this {{Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS}} any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas. |
New:
when trying to execute test case job in Jenkins using TAP I will always see Testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and communicate on every build colored text perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong? file name: gui_arguments content: {noformat}1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments{noformat} then the result shows this {noformat}Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS{noformat} any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas. |
Description |
Original:
when trying to execute test case job in Jenkins using TAP I will always see Testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and communicate on every build colored text perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong? file name: gui_arguments content: {noformat}1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments{noformat} then the result shows this {noformat}Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS{noformat} any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas. |
New:
when trying to execute test case job in Jenkins using TAP I will always see Testlink result as 'Not run' but build number variable is sent to testlink to create a new build there, so they know about each other and communicate on every build colored text perhaps my implementation of TAP file format/name is wrong? file name: gui_arguments content: {noformat}1..2 not ok 1 - gui_arguments not ok 2 - gui_arguments{noformat} then the result shows this {noformat}Executing iterative Build Steps. Looking for the test results of TestLink test cases. Found 1 test result(s). Archiving artifacts Finished: SUCCESS{noformat} but status results are always like this: TestLink build ID: 3 TestLink build name: 0.10 Total of 1 tests. Where 0 passed, 0 failed, 0 were blocked and 1 were not executed. List of test cases and execution result status ||Test case ID||Test case external ID||Version||Name||Test project ID||Execution status|| |1113|OTC-31|1|automatic test test|1|Not Run| any ideas? I spent few days and 32 runs of the job to get here and running out of ideas. |
Labels | Original: tapResults | New: results tapResults |
Priority | Original: Major [ 3 ] | New: Blocker [ 1 ] |