Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-4532

Ability to use tools in ad-hoc fashion

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: New Feature New Feature
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: Major Major
    • core
    • None
    • Platform: All, OS: All

      For some purposes it is desirable to use a ToolInstallation during a build, but
      not in the expected way - such as running hudson.tasks.Ant or setting a
      Project.jdk. Examples from deadlock.netbeans.org:

      1. You may wish to associate JDK 6 with the build, i.e. actually put jdk6/bin
      into $PATH and set JAVA_HOME to jdk6, yet also compile certain sources against
      JDK 5 (or run unit tests using JDK 5) to ensure compatibility. Currently you
      have to hardcode the JDK 5 location, which makes tool installation useless.

      2. You may wish to run a shell script which runs Ant targets or Maven goals
      along with some other things, rather than using Hudson's built-in tasks for
      these things. Currently you can either assume some appropriate version of 'ant'
      or 'mvn' is in the server's $PATH, or hardcode locations to these tools.

      Better would be a BuildWrapper which would let you configure a list of required
      tools (of any type, as listed in Hudson global configuration) as well as
      matching environment variable names (perhaps defaulting to the tool name plus
      '_HOME'). buildEnvVars would then get these tools for the node (meaning
      installing them if necessary) and set the env vars according to
      ToolInstallation.home.

      For example, your if your server config had an "ant171" installed from
      apache.org, your project configuration might request "ant171" -> ANT_HOME, and
      your build script could say

      $ANT_HOME/bin/ant build

      Or if your server config had "jdk5" installed from sun.com as 1.5.0_18, your
      project config could have "jdk5" -> JDK5_HOME, and your build script could say

      javac src/*.java -bootclasspath $JDK5_HOME/jre/lib/rt.jar

      to ensure you were not using newer platform classes.

      The Java part of this should be trivial to write, probably as a plugin. I have
      no clue how to convince Jelly + /lib/form to display & persist an expandable
      list of rows each containing a ToolInstallation.name in a dropdown next to a
      textbox for the var name.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            jglick Jesse Glick
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            7 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: