Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-4819

Enable/disable build step by one click

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: New Feature
    • Status: Open (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Component/s: core
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Platform: All, OS: All
    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      It is uncomfortable to temporary disable a build step in job configuration. The
      only way currently to remove it. It would be good to have an enable/disable
      checkbox.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is duplicated by

          New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. JENKINS-27658 Add Disable feature for Build Step

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved
          is related to

          New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. JENKINS-9616 Revert configuration to an older version

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            6 older comments
            Hide
            Permalink
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            Added to the consideration for Jenkins 2.0

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - Added to the consideration for Jenkins 2.0
            Hide
            Permalink
            sdarwin Sam Darwin added a comment -

            As Milan said "Enable/disable build step checkbox would be extremely useful."

            Show
            sdarwin Sam Darwin added a comment - As Milan said "Enable/disable build step checkbox would be extremely useful."
            Hide
            Permalink
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment -

            Sam Darwin Nobody disputes that. It's just a matter of priorities and finding the time to do this. As usual, contributions welcome

            FWIW I had a prototype of this in https://github.com/daniel-beck/jenkins/commit/18d434fa6bf8b3efc8b0b39cb9cc064368dc4bec but it was shot down by Jesse Glick, complete with explanation how to do it right.

            Show
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment - Sam Darwin Nobody disputes that. It's just a matter of priorities and finding the time to do this. As usual, contributions welcome FWIW I had a prototype of this in https://github.com/daniel-beck/jenkins/commit/18d434fa6bf8b3efc8b0b39cb9cc064368dc4bec but it was shot down by Jesse Glick , complete with explanation how to do it right.
            Hide
            Permalink
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment -

            FTR any build step with descriptor overriding newInstance will not be compatible with my previous approach AFAICT. It's not just the ones with readResolve.

            Show
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment - FTR any build step with descriptor overriding newInstance will not be compatible with my previous approach AFAICT. It's not just the ones with readResolve .
            Hide
            Permalink
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment -

            I don't expect I'll have the time to implement this any time soon.

            Show
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment - I don't expect I'll have the time to implement this any time soon.

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              liptga liptga
              Votes:
              25 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              26 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated: