Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-51227

Quiet period should be configured from declarative pipelines

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      The "quiet period"  option is not possible to be configured from the Declarative pipeline like "options" or "parameters".

       

      Could be interesting to have that feature inside the declarative pipelines.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is blocking

          New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. JENKINS-30519 Declarative job properties in multibranch

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved
          relates to

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. JENKINS-37588 Multibranch pipeline does not allow quiet time or throttle

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Closed
          links to

          Web Link PR #283

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            jraezrus Javier Raez created issue -
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue is blocking JENKINS-30519 [ JENKINS-30519 ]
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Component/s workflow-job-plugin [ 21716 ]
            Component/s pipeline [ 21692 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            Nothing to do with Declarative vs. Scripted, only multibranch vs. standalone.

            Show
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - Nothing to do with Declarative vs. Scripted, only multibranch vs. standalone.
            Hide
            Permalink
            abayer Andrew Bayer added a comment -

            We could work around this in Declarative with a DeclarativeOption that results in setting the quiet period for the job...worth considering.

            Show
            abayer Andrew Bayer added a comment - We could work around this in Declarative with a DeclarativeOption that results in setting the quiet period for the job...worth considering.
            Hide
            Permalink
            jraezrus Javier Raez added a comment -

            That should be enough Andrew, and great.

            Show
            jraezrus Javier Raez added a comment - That should be enough Andrew, and great.
            Hide
            Permalink
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment -

            Isn't the use case of commits arriving in quick succession obsolete since Git and cloud agents?

            Show
            danielbeck Daniel Beck added a comment - Isn't the use case of commits arriving in quick succession obsolete since Git and cloud agents?
            Hide
            Permalink
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            Yes, I think so…on some rainy day I may propose an issue to deprecate the very concept of a quiet period in Jenkins core, and make it a plugin you can install for exotic use cases.

            Show
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - Yes, I think so…on some rainy day I may propose an issue to deprecate the very concept of a quiet period in Jenkins core, and make it a plugin you can install for exotic use cases.
            abayer Andrew Bayer made changes -
            Component/s pipeline-model-definition-plugin [ 21706 ]
            Component/s workflow-job-plugin [ 21716 ]
            abayer Andrew Bayer made changes -
            Assignee Andrew Bayer [ abayer ]
            abayer Andrew Bayer made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            abayer Andrew Bayer made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] In Review [ 10005 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            abayer Andrew Bayer added a comment -

            PR up at https://github.com/jenkinsci/pipeline-model-definition-plugin/pull/283

            Show
            abayer Andrew Bayer added a comment - PR up at https://github.com/jenkinsci/pipeline-model-definition-plugin/pull/283
            abayer Andrew Bayer made changes -
            Remote Link This issue links to "PR #283 (Web Link)" [ 21307 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            abayer Andrew Bayer added a comment -

            will be in Declarative 1.3.2.

            Show
            abayer Andrew Bayer added a comment - will be in Declarative 1.3.2.
            abayer Andrew Bayer made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status In Review [ 10005 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
            jglick Jesse Glick made changes -
            Link This issue relates to JENKINS-37588 [ JENKINS-37588 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            bitwiseman Liam Newman added a comment -

            Bulk closing resolved issues.

            Show
            bitwiseman Liam Newman added a comment - Bulk closing resolved issues.
            bitwiseman Liam Newman made changes -
            Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]

              People

              Assignee:
              abayer Andrew Bayer
              Reporter:
              jraezrus Javier Raez
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: