Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-58692

Change in treatment of Success - Stable vs. Unstable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
    • Icon: Critical Critical
    • core

      We've recently noticed on our Jenkins instance (at build.kde.org) that builds which are unstable are no longer considered "Successful" by Jenkins.

      This means that all of our views are now broken, because we've used "Successful" as meaning it successfully built (even if tests failed). Our expectations appear to align with the Jenkins terminology guide ( https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Terminology )

      This behaviour appeared sometime after Jenkins 2.184, and can be viewed at https://build.kde.org/job/Applications/view/Everything%20-%20stable-kf5-qt5/job/kopete/job/stable-kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.12/

      (Note that only Build #1 is considered Successful, even though all builds of that job had the result of being Unstable. The correct behaviour in this instance should be for the latest Successful activity for that job to be Build #4 - as it did complete successfully, even if it is unstable)

          [JENKINS-58692] Change in treatment of Success - Stable vs. Unstable

          Ben Cooksley created issue -
          Ben Cooksley made changes -
          Priority Original: Major [ 3 ] New: Critical [ 2 ]
          Ben Cooksley made changes -
          Component/s New: git-plugin [ 15543 ]
          Jesse Glick made changes -
          Link New: This issue relates to JENKINS-37862 [ JENKINS-37862 ]
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Component/s Original: git-plugin [ 15543 ]
          Oleg Nenashev made changes -
          Labels New: regression
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Resolution New: Cannot Reproduce [ 5 ]
          Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: Fixed but Unreleased [ 10203 ]
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Status Original: Fixed but Unreleased [ 10203 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]

            Unassigned Unassigned
            bcooksley Ben Cooksley
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: