Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-62400

Red Hat repo definition needs improvements

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      Jason Pyeron noted that that the Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Fedora, Amazon Linux, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.

      Attachments

        Activity

          Hi. How could I help with this one?

          alfabravoteam Andres Salcedo added a comment - Hi. How could I help with this one?
          timja Tim Jacomb added a comment - - edited

          The repo is https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging for most of the code

          Some of it is in https://github.com/jenkins-infra/release

          Note: our current main branch is INFRA-910-core-release-automation, submit changes against that, we plan to merge it to master in 1-2 weeks.

          I've heard a couple of issues from people, the repo isn't gpg signed, and init d scripts are used instead of systemd.

          timja Tim Jacomb added a comment - - edited The repo is https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging for most of the code Some of it is in https://github.com/jenkins-infra/release Note: our current main branch is INFRA-910-core-release-automation, submit changes against that, we plan to merge it to master in 1-2 weeks. I've heard a couple of issues from people, the repo isn't gpg signed, and init d scripts are used instead of systemd.

          People

            scanepa Stefano Canepa
            markewaite Mark Waite
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: