Pay Bas added a comment - 2024-09-17 11:00 - edited I'm happy to submit a PR which removes the problematic functionality, since it's trivial to do. But I'd like a go-ahead before doing so. Proposed patch: Subject: [PATCH] JENKINS-73788 Reduce metrics bloat relating to  provision.request---  .../plugins/kubernetes/KubernetesCloud.java     |  2 --  .../jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNames.java |  6 ------  .../plugins/kubernetes/MetricNamesTest.java     | 17 -----------------  .../pipeline/KubernetesPipelineTest.java        |  4 ----  4 files changed, 29 deletions(-)diff --git a/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/KubernetesCloud.java b/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/KubernetesCloud.java index 10d30fcb..81f5091d 100644 --- a/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/KubernetesCloud.java +++ b/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/KubernetesCloud.java @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ package org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes;     import static java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets.UTF_8;   import static org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils.isEmpty; - import static org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.MetricNames.metricNameForLabel;     import com.cloudbees.plugins.credentials.CredentialsMatchers;   import com.cloudbees.plugins.credentials.common.StandardCredentials; @@ -599,7 +598,6 @@ public class KubernetesCloud extends Cloud implements PodTemplateGroup {              @NonNull final Cloud.CloudState state, final int excessWorkload) {           var limitRegistrationResults = new LimitRegistrationResults( this );           try { -            Metrics.metricRegistry().meter(metricNameForLabel(state.getLabel())).mark(excessWorkload);              Label label = state.getLabel();               // Planned nodes, will be launched on the next round of NodeProvisioner               int plannedCapacity = state.getAdditionalPlannedCapacity(); diff --git a/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNames.java b/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNames.java index ee586771..23a48bc4 100644 --- a/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNames.java +++ b/src/main/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNames.java @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@   package org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes;   - import hudson.model.Label;   import java.util.Locale;     public class MetricNames { @@ -21,9 +20,4 @@ public class MetricNames {           String formattedStatus = status == null ? " null " : status.toLowerCase(Locale.getDefault());           return PREFIX + ".pods.launch.status." + formattedStatus;      } - -     public static String metricNameForLabel(Label label) { -         String labelText = (label == null ) ? "nolabel" : label.getDisplayName(); -         return String .format( "%s.%s.provision.request" , PREFIX, labelText); -    }  } diff --git a/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNamesTest.java b/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNamesTest.java index 892125a1..68560458 100644 --- a/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNamesTest.java +++ b/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/MetricNamesTest.java @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@   package org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes;   - import hudson.model.labels.LabelAtom;   import org.junit.Assert;   import org.junit.Test;   @@ -29,20 +28,4 @@ public class MetricNamesTest {            Assert.assertEquals(expected, actual);      } - -    @Test -     public void metricNameForLabelAddsNoLabelIfLabelIsNull() { -         String expected = "kubernetes.cloud.nolabel.provision.request" ; -         String actual = MetricNames.metricNameForLabel( null ); - -        Assert.assertEquals(expected, actual); -    } - -    @Test -     public void metricNameForLabelAddsLabelValue() { -         String expected = "kubernetes.cloud.java.provision.request" ; -         String actual = MetricNames.metricNameForLabel( new LabelAtom( "java" )); - -        Assert.assertEquals(expected, actual); -    }  } diff --git a/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/pipeline/KubernetesPipelineTest.java b/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/pipeline/KubernetesPipelineTest.java index b5b23ac1..a7b43a91 100644 --- a/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/pipeline/KubernetesPipelineTest.java +++ b/src/test/java/org/csanchez/jenkins/plugins/kubernetes/pipeline/KubernetesPipelineTest.java @@ -252,10 +252,6 @@ public class KubernetesPipelineTest extends AbstractKubernetesPipelineTest {                  emptyIterable());            assertTrue(Metrics.metricRegistry().counter(MetricNames.PODS_LAUNCHED).getCount() > 0); -        assertTrue(Metrics.metricRegistry() -                        .meter(MetricNames.metricNameForLabel(Label.parseExpression( "runInPod" ))) -                        .getCount() -                > 0);      }        @Test --  2.46.1

Mark Waite added a comment - 2024-09-17 11:58 paybas I think that the best "go-ahead" will come from a review of the pull request. I'm not sure if the maintainers of the Kubernetes plugin are regularly reviewing Jira issues. I believe they are more likely to be regularly reviewing pull requests than Jira issues.

Pay Bas added a comment - 2024-09-17 12:44 That's fine markewaite   Pull-request: https://github.com/jenkinsci/kubernetes-plugin/pull/1604