Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
Platform: All, OS: All
Description
This is a "would be nice to have" request, so please file it accordingly! :o)
When a developer destroys a sub-branch of the one Hudson is monitoring, a build is triggered, even
though no modification to the watched branch occurred.
For instance, let's say my project is watching "feature_1.23" and the following change is found:
"20080326.110739" "esmalling" "destroy sub-branch "esmalling_branch" of branch"
"vobs/gtx2/core/src/foo/bar/MyFile.java" "/main/feature_1.23"
Destroyed branch "/main/feature_1.23/esmalling_branch".
That's not something we want to have built.
But if the feature_1.23 branch itself was destroyed, then we DO want a build.
What is the difference between a branch and a sub branch? Why would you like a build if
the branch was destroyed, I mean unless all files were removed then nothing really happened?
I have another user request that it should ignore the "destroyed branch" actions, so I
dont know what to do.
Do you know of any place where I can find all types of actions that can show up in the
history? To be able to ignore change log actions I must know the exact action phrase ("create
branch", etc.)