Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-27395

distinguish test reports filed from different parts of workflow

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Pipeline - July/August, Pipeline - December

    Description

      JUnit test result archiving can happen multiple times inside workflow, and currently there's no way to meaningfully distinguish multiple invocations.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            sid_s Sid S added a comment -

            trejkaz, could you share your XSLT file or link to it?

            sid_s Sid S added a comment - trejkaz , could you share your XSLT file or link to it?
            trejkaz trejkaz added a comment -

            We don't use an XSLT yet because we're using Gradle's reports, which are already in the right format.

             

            trejkaz trejkaz added a comment - We don't use an XSLT yet because we're using Gradle's reports, which are already in the right format.  

            We had the same problem, but managed to work it out.

            When we started using a Jenkinsfile we copied this example, however this bypasses the code that keeps each run of tests independent.

            step([$class : 'JUnitResultArchiver', testResults: '**/build/test-results/**/*.xml'])
            

            What we now use and works is:

            junit testResults: '**/build/test-results/**/*.xml'
            
            ottago Nicholas Klopfer-Webber added a comment - We had the same problem, but managed to work it out. When we started using a Jenkinsfile we copied this example, however this bypasses the code that keeps each run of tests independent. step([$class : 'JUnitResultArchiver' , testResults: '**/build/test-results /**/ *.xml' ]) What we now use and works is: junit testResults: '**/build/test-results /**/ *.xml'
            mark_han Mark Han added a comment -

            I think there's still a problem where running a simple `./gradlew test` merges all tests into one section, even though there can be multiple flavors of tests run. Not sure if this is the case if we explicitly break up the flavors e.g. `./gradlew testDebug` Do we need to break up `./gradlew` commands between separate stages? 

            mark_han Mark Han added a comment - I think there's still a problem where running a simple `./gradlew test` merges all tests into one section, even though there can be multiple flavors of tests run. Not sure if this is the case if we explicitly break up the flavors e.g. `./gradlew testDebug` Do we need to break up `./gradlew` commands between separate stages? 
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            Do we need to break up ./gradlew commands between separate stages?

            Currently I am afraid you do.

            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - Do we need to break up ./gradlew commands between separate stages? Currently I am afraid you do.

            People

              abayer Andrew Bayer
              kohsuke Kohsuke Kawaguchi
              Votes:
              35 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              65 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: