Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-64251

Remote.jar is not working anymore because of changed parameter slave.jar->agent.jar

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • docker-plugin

    Description

      I use the docker plugin to execute jobs remote in another docker-container. I configured the cloud with default parameters and the "connect method": "Attach Docker container". When i execute a job, i get the message, that the used parameter "-slaveLog" is invalid. 

      The reason for that is, that Jeff removed the parameter alias in version 4.6 of remoting.jar so just "-agentLog" is valid now (pull request here). With jenkins 2.266 the remote-4.6.jar is the new default, so the docker-plugin's default settings (for the "Attach" method) are no longer viable - it's now necessary to override the defaults to make it work.

      Attachments

        Activity

          frickeldave David Koenig created issue -
          frickeldave David Koenig made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Link This issue duplicates INFRA-2817 [ INFRA-2817 ]
          frickeldave David Koenig made changes -
          Summary Remote.jar is not working anymore becuase of changed parameter slave.jar->agent.jar Remote.jar is not working anymore because of changed parameter slave.jar->agent.jar
          frickeldave David Koenig made changes -
          Environment Jenkins 266 (not solved 267)
          Docker plugin 1.2.1
          OS Debian 9
          Jenkins in Docker container (Based on Debian)
          Jenkins-Slave Docker Image (Based on Debian)
          Java 11 is used in master and slave container
          Jenkins 266 (not solved in 267)
          Docker plugin 1.2.1
          OS Debian 9
          Jenkins in Docker container (Based on Debian)
          Jenkins-Slave Docker Image (Based on Debian)
          Java 11 is used in master and slave container
          frickeldave David Koenig made changes -
          Environment Jenkins 266 (not solved in 267)
          Docker plugin 1.2.1
          OS Debian 9
          Jenkins in Docker container (Based on Debian)
          Jenkins-Slave Docker Image (Based on Debian)
          Java 11 is used in master and slave container
          Jenkins 266 (not solved in 267)
          Docker plugin 1.2.1
          OS Debian 9
          Docker version 19.03.13
          Jenkins in Docker container (Based on Debian)
          Jenkins-Slave Docker Image (Based on Debian)
          Java 11 is used in master and slave container
          frickeldave David Koenig made changes -
          Comment [ I accidentaly created the issue INFRA-2817 before, but i am not able to delete that.  ]
          pjdarton pjdarton made changes -
          Environment Jenkins 266 (not solved in 267)
          Docker plugin 1.2.1
          OS Debian 9
          Docker version 19.03.13
          Jenkins in Docker container (Based on Debian)
          Jenkins-Slave Docker Image (Based on Debian)
          Java 11 is used in master and slave container
          Jenkins 2.266 (not solved in 267)
          Docker plugin 1.2.1
          OS Debian 9
          Docker version 19.03.13
          Jenkins in Docker container (Based on Debian)
          Jenkins-Slave Docker Image (Based on Debian)
          Java 11 is used in master and slave container
          pjdarton pjdarton made changes -
          Description I use the docker plugin to execute jobs remote in another docker-container. I configured the cloud with default parameters and the "connect method": "Attach Docker container". When i execute a job, i get the message, that the used parameter "-slaveLog" is invalid. 

          The reason for that is, that Jeff removed t[he parameter alias|https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-users/c/ZWdWjYbfmPI] in version 4.6 of remoting.jar so just "-agentLog" is valid now (pull request [here|https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/pull/416]). With jenkins 2.266 the remote-4.6.jar is the new default, so no builds are possible now with docker plugin. 

           

           
          I use the docker plugin to execute jobs remote in another docker-container. I configured the cloud with default parameters and the "connect method": "Attach Docker container". When i execute a job, i get the message, that the used parameter "-slaveLog" is invalid. 

          The reason for that is, that Jeff removed t[he parameter alias|https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-users/c/ZWdWjYbfmPI] in version 4.6 of remoting.jar so just "-agentLog" is valid now (pull request [here|https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/pull/416]). With jenkins 2.266 the remote-4.6.jar is the new default, so the docker-plugin's default settings (for the "Attach" method) are no longer viable - it's now necessary to override the defaults to make it work.
          pjdarton pjdarton added a comment -

          The original descripiton said "no builds are possible now" - that was incorrect ... builds are still possible; the problem is that the default settings are no longer viable (if you override them, it can still work).

          See this comment in docker-plugin issue 818 for details of the workaround.

          pjdarton pjdarton added a comment - The original descripiton said "no builds are possible now" - that was incorrect ... builds are still possible; the problem is that the default settings are no longer viable (if you override them, it can still work). See this comment in docker-plugin issue 818 for details of the workaround.
          pjdarton pjdarton made changes -
          Assignee Nicolas De Loof [ ndeloof ] pjdarton [ pjdarton ]
          jthompson Jeff Thompson added a comment -

          I looked for usages but apparently I missed this one. It just needs to be fixed in the plugin.

          jthompson Jeff Thompson added a comment - I looked for usages but apparently I missed this one. It just needs to be fixed in the plugin.
          pjdarton pjdarton made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
          pjdarton pjdarton added a comment -

          Fixed in the next release.

          pjdarton pjdarton added a comment - Fixed in the next release.
          pjdarton pjdarton made changes -
          Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status In Progress [ 3 ] Fixed but Unreleased [ 10203 ]
          frickeldave David Koenig added a comment -

          It doesn't seem to work with the described workaround. When i update jenkins to version 2.275, and add the EntryPoint Cmd "${JAVA_EXE} ${JVM_ARGS} -jar ${FS_DIR}/${JAR_NAME} -noReconnect -noKeepAlive -agentLog ${FS_DIR}/agent.log", i get the following content in the logfile of the jenkins master: 

          2021-01-18 23:20:35.621+0000 [id=33] INFO c.n.j.plugins.docker.DockerCloud#provision: Will provision 'cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest', for label: 'lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave', in cloud: 'lcl-slave-cloud'
          2021-01-18 23:20:35.625+0000 [id=238] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for image "cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest"
          2021-01-18 23:20:35.626+0000 [id=238] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0000qbpplgfpg from image: cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest
          2021-01-18 23:20:35.627+0000 [id=33] INFO h.s.NodeProvisioner$StandardStrategyImpl#apply: Started provisioning Image of cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest from lcl-slave-cloud with 1 executors. Remaining excess workload: 0
          2021-01-18 23:20:35.717+0000 [id=238] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Started container ID 8887888b049d2a2c8b01ceaa7e0f1737bc81ae7d96a9460fe76eb3b60c2f0ffa for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0000qbpplgfpg from image: cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest
          2021-01-18 23:20:45.613+0000 [id=36] INFO hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner#lambda$update$6: Image of cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest provisioning successfully completed. We have now 6 computer(s)
          2021-01-18 23:20:45.633+0000 [id=36] INFO c.n.j.plugins.docker.DockerCloud#canAddProvisionedSlave: Provisioning 'cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest' on 'lcl-slave-cloud'; Total containers: 5 (of 6)

          As you can see, the container will be started 6 times, but nothing happens. I tried to replace the variables by fixed values <- same result. There no logs written in the slave container.  Exact the same configuration (set statically with casc.yml on newly created containers, so its definitivly the same config) work with a Jenkins 2.265 version without setting the EntryPoint cmd). Do you have any idea? Do i something wrong?

          frickeldave David Koenig added a comment - It doesn't seem to work with the described workaround. When i update jenkins to version 2.275, and add the EntryPoint Cmd " ${JAVA_EXE} ${JVM_ARGS} -jar ${FS_DIR}/${JAR_NAME} -noReconnect -noKeepAlive -agentLog ${FS_DIR}/agent.log ", i get the following content in the logfile of the jenkins master:  2021-01-18 23:20:35.621+0000 [id=33] INFO c.n.j.plugins.docker.DockerCloud#provision: Will provision 'cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest', for label: 'lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave', in cloud: 'lcl-slave-cloud' 2021-01-18 23:20:35.625+0000 [id=238] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for image "cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest" 2021-01-18 23:20:35.626+0000 [id=238] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0000qbpplgfpg from image: cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest 2021-01-18 23:20:35.627+0000 [id=33] INFO h.s.NodeProvisioner$StandardStrategyImpl#apply: Started provisioning Image of cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest from lcl-slave-cloud with 1 executors. Remaining excess workload: 0 2021-01-18 23:20:35.717+0000 [id=238] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Started container ID 8887888b049d2a2c8b01ceaa7e0f1737bc81ae7d96a9460fe76eb3b60c2f0ffa for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0000qbpplgfpg from image: cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest 2021-01-18 23:20:45.613+0000 [id=36] INFO hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner#lambda$update$6: Image of cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest provisioning successfully completed. We have now 6 computer(s) 2021-01-18 23:20:45.633+0000 [id=36] INFO c.n.j.plugins.docker.DockerCloud#canAddProvisionedSlave: Provisioning 'cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest' on 'lcl-slave-cloud'; Total containers: 5 (of 6) As you can see, the container will be started 6 times, but nothing happens. I tried to replace the variables by fixed values <- same result. There no logs written in the slave container.  Exact the same configuration (set statically with casc.yml on newly created containers, so its definitivly the same config) work with a Jenkins 2.265 version without setting the EntryPoint cmd).  Do you have any idea? Do i something wrong?
          frickeldave David Koenig added a comment -

          An addition info: In my docker images with Jenkins 2.275 i installed the rc of the plugin (with docker-plugin:incrementals;io.jenkins.docker;1.2.2-rc968.579d1401cd89 in plugins.txt). 

          In the logfile of my Jenkins Container i see, that it will be installed. 

          Will use url: https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/io/jenkins/docker/docker-plugin/1.2.2-rc968.579d1401cd89/docker-plugin-1.2.2-rc968.579d1401cd89.hpi to download docker-plugin plugin

          But when i try to build something i get this result: 

          2021-01-19 00:04:33.440+0000 [id=158] WARNING i.j.d.c.DockerMultiplexedInputStream#readInternal: Unexpected data on container stderr: -agentLog FILE : Local agent error log destination (overrides workDir)
          {{ -auth user:pass : If your Jenkins is security-enabled, specify}}

          ...

          ...

          ...

          frickeldave David Koenig added a comment - An addition info: In my docker images with Jenkins 2.275 i installed the rc of the plugin (with docker-plugin:incrementals;io.jenkins.docker;1.2.2-rc968.579d1401cd89 in plugins.txt).  In the logfile of my Jenkins Container i see, that it will be installed.  Will use url: https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/io/jenkins/docker/docker-plugin/1.2.2-rc968.579d1401cd89/docker-plugin-1.2.2-rc968.579d1401cd89.hpi to download docker-plugin plugin But when i try to build something i get this result:  2021-01-19 00:04:33.440+0000 [id=158] WARNING i.j.d.c.DockerMultiplexedInputStream#readInternal: Unexpected data on container stderr: -agentLog FILE : Local agent error log destination (overrides  workDir) {{ -auth user:pass : If your Jenkins is security-enabled, specify}} ... ... ...
          pjdarton pjdarton added a comment -

          That's weird... the URL of the incrementals build you've listed isn't the URL of the latest build -  that one is from 14th Dec 2020, not the 16th Dec 2020.
          What you've used is the lexicographically last listed build, but it looks like they're not listed 100% in date order (which is peculiar, but it's not something I control).

          Try using the 16th Dec 2020 version, https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/io/jenkins/docker/docker-plugin/1.2.2-rc962.2f58af3fa582/docker-plugin-1.2.2-rc962.2f58af3fa582.hpi
          That includes the fix I've implemented.

          ...or grab it from https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/docker-plugin/job/master/ which should always give you the lastest "bleeding edge" build.

          pjdarton pjdarton added a comment - That's weird... the URL of the incrementals build you've listed isn't the URL of the latest build -  that one is from 14th Dec 2020, not the 16th Dec 2020. What you've used is the lexicographically last listed build, but it looks like they're not listed 100% in date order (which is peculiar, but it's not something I control). Try using the 16th Dec 2020 version, https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/io/jenkins/docker/docker-plugin/1.2.2-rc962.2f58af3fa582/docker-plugin-1.2.2-rc962.2f58af3fa582.hpi That includes the fix I've implemented. ...or grab it from https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/docker-plugin/job/master/ which should always give you the lastest "bleeding edge" build.
          frickeldave David Koenig made changes -
          Comment [ Hi, 

          sorry for the delay, had some other topics to solve. But now i tested it. I installed the referenced version. Now i didn't get any error message but nothing happens. The output of jenkins says: 
          {quote} 
          {code:java}
          ...
          ...
          2021-01-25 22:04:57.418+0000 [id=872] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for image ".../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest"
          2021-01-25 22:04:57.419+0000 [id=872] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0002qa5i1lju8 from image: .../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest
          2021-01-25 22:04:57.471+0000 [id=872] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Started container ID 999bf690189d002e788164d392994eaa2aa051676ae60f684e69f81db88fa34f for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0002qa5i1lju8 from image: .../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.393+0000 [id=36] INFO hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner#lambda$update$6: Image of .../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest provisioning successfully completed. We have now 6 computer(s)
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.401+0000 [id=36] INFO c.n.j.plugins.docker.DockerCloud#canAddProvisionedAgent: Provisioning '.../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest' on 'lcl-slave-cloud'; Total containers: 5 (of 6)
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.402+0000 [id=36] INFO c.n.j.plugins.docker.DockerCloud#provision: Will provision '.../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest', for label: 'lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave', in cloud: 'lcl-slave-cloud'
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.406+0000 [id=869] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for image "...s/cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest"
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.407+0000 [id=869] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Trying to run container for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0002qaa38dv98 from image: .../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.407+0000 [id=36] INFO h.s.NodeProvisioner$StandardStrategyImpl#apply: Started provisioning Image of ..../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest from lcl-slave-cloud with 1 executors. Remaining excess workload: 0
          2021-01-25 22:05:07.470+0000 [id=869] INFO c.n.j.p.docker.DockerTemplate#doProvisionNode: Started container ID 7887c8933316fce8a5b1064813696e6424e69b1049a24d97b06b96258125bad9 for node lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave-0002qaa38dv98 from image: .../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest
          2021-01-25 22:05:17.393+0000 [id=35] INFO hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner#lambda$update$6: Image of .../cid-jenkins-debian-slave:latest provisioning successfully completed. We have now 7 computer(s)
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.757+0000 [id=891] INFO hudson.model.AsyncPeriodicWork#lambda$doRun$0: Started DockerContainerWatchdog Asynchronous Periodic Work
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.758+0000 [id=891] INFO c.n.j.p.d.DockerContainerWatchdog#execute: Docker Container Watchdog has been triggered
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.758+0000 [id=891] INFO c.n.j.p.d.DockerContainerWatchdog$Statistics#writeStatisticsToLog: Watchdog Statistics: Number of overall executions: 17, Executions with processing timeout: 0, Containers removed gracefully: 5, Containers removed with force: 0, Containers removal failed: 0, Nodes removed successfully: 7, Nodes removal failed: 0, Container removal average duration (gracefully): 1712 ms, Container removal average duration (force): 0 ms, Average overall runtime of watchdog: 754 ms, Average runtime of container retrieval: 120 ms
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.759+0000 [id=891] INFO c.n.j.p.d.DockerContainerWatchdog#loadNodeMap: We currently have 6 nodes assigned to this Jenkins instance, which we will check
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.760+0000 [id=891] INFO c.n.j.p.d.DockerContainerWatchdog#execute: Checking Docker Cloud lcl-slave-cloud at unix:///var/run/docker.sock
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.788+0000 [id=891] INFO c.n.j.p.d.DockerContainerWatchdog#execute: Docker Container Watchdog check has been completed
          2021-01-25 22:05:55.791+0000 [id=891] INFO hudson.model.AsyncPeriodicWork#lambda$doRun$0: Finished DockerContainerWatchdog Asynchronous Periodic Work. 30 ms
          {code}
           
          {quote}
           

          So the container start and it seems successful, but the console just shows me, that the node is offline.  

          The Thread dump (http://JENKINS_SERVER/job/.../.../threadDump) shows me the following content: 


          at DSL.node(waiting for part of master » 20 - Integrationtest #8 to be scheduled; blocked: All nodes of label ‘lcl_cid-jenkins-debian-slave’ are offline)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.agent.impl.LabelScript.run(LabelScript.groovy:42)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inDeclarativeAgent(ModelInterpreter.groovy:589)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateStage(ModelInterpreter.groovy:272)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.stageInput(ModelInterpreter.groovy:356)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.stageInput(ModelInterpreter.groovy:355)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateStage(ModelInterpreter.groovy:261)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inWrappers(ModelInterpreter.groovy:613)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inWrappers(ModelInterpreter.groovy:612)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateStage(ModelInterpreter.groovy:259)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.withEnvBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:443)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.withEnvBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:442)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateStage(ModelInterpreter.groovy:254)
          at DSL.stage(Native Method)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateStage(ModelInterpreter.groovy:240)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateSequentialStages(ModelInterpreter.groovy:172)
          at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2030)
          at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2015)
          at com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2056)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.evaluateSequentialStages(ModelInterpreter.groovy:157)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.call(ModelInterpreter.groovy:84)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.toolsBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:544)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.toolsBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:543)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.call(ModelInterpreter.groovy:83)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.recursiveWrappers(ModelInterpreter.groovy:628)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.recursiveWrappers(ModelInterpreter.groovy:627)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inWrappers(ModelInterpreter.groovy:609)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inWrappers(ModelInterpreter.groovy:608)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.call(ModelInterpreter.groovy:79)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.withEnvBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:443)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.withEnvBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:442)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.call(ModelInterpreter.groovy:78)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.withCredentialsBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:481)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.withCredentialsBlock(ModelInterpreter.groovy:480)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.call(ModelInterpreter.groovy:77)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inDeclarativeAgent(ModelInterpreter.groovy:590)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.agent.CheckoutScript.checkoutAndRun(CheckoutScript.groovy:64)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.agent.CheckoutScript.doCheckout(CheckoutScript.groovy:40)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.agent.impl.LabelScript.run(LabelScript.groovy:43)
          at DSL.node(running on )
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.agent.impl.LabelScript.run(LabelScript.groovy:42)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.inDeclarativeAgent(ModelInterpreter.groovy:589)
          at org.jenkinsci.plugins.pipeline.modeldefinition.ModelInterpreter.call(ModelInterpreter.groovy:76)
          at WorkflowScript.run(WorkflowScript:2)
           

          Any idea for me, what to try next? 

          Regards


          Dave ]
          frickeldave David Koenig added a comment -

          Hi, 

          thank you very much, works now. 

          Regards

          Dave

          frickeldave David Koenig added a comment - Hi,  thank you very much, works now.  Regards Dave
          pjdarton pjdarton made changes -
          Status Fixed but Unreleased [ 10203 ] Resolved [ 5 ]

          People

            pjdarton pjdarton
            frickeldave David Koenig
            Votes:
            2 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: