Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-17804

tapResults TAP Test Results filtering by test status

      Some of our jobs have a very large number of tests. The capability to hide passed tests from the tapResults page would greatly help in homing in on those tests which fail.

          [JENKINS-17804] tapResults TAP Test Results filtering by test status

          Sounds like a good idea. I believe we can include this feature in the next release.

          Thanks!

          Bruno P. Kinoshita added a comment - Sounds like a good idea. I believe we can include this feature in the next release. Thanks!

          Code changed in jenkins
          User: Bruno P. Kinoshita
          Path:
          src/main/java/org/tap4j/plugin/TapPublisher.java
          src/main/java/org/tap4j/plugin/TapResult.java
          src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/TapPublisher/config.jelly
          src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/TapResult/index.jelly
          src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/tags/line.jelly
          src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/tags/yaml.jelly
          http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/tap-plugin/eb95aac4f93273e8d821d818500be9b69af7fa07
          Log:
          [FIXED JENKINS-17804] Add option to show only failures

          SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment - Code changed in jenkins User: Bruno P. Kinoshita Path: src/main/java/org/tap4j/plugin/TapPublisher.java src/main/java/org/tap4j/plugin/TapResult.java src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/TapPublisher/config.jelly src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/TapResult/index.jelly src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/tags/line.jelly src/main/resources/org/tap4j/plugin/tags/yaml.jelly http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/tap-plugin/eb95aac4f93273e8d821d818500be9b69af7fa07 Log: [FIXED JENKINS-17804] Add option to show only failures

          Feature coming in the next release. Let's start simple, with a checkbox that allows you to show only "NOT OK".

          In a 2.0 or further, it would be great if we had a way to filter by status and directive. For example, NOT OK and TODO.

          You will have to trigger a new build to apply the filter (part of this happens in the server side). But we can also re-think in the future, in a client-side solution. Though if we want to support a lot of tests, that's probably not a good idea.

          Thanks for reporting, and sorry for taking so long to reply.

          Give it a try, let us know if that worked, and let's continue refining the code. The next releases are bugfixes, but we will have a 2.0, probably this year, focused in performance and polish the code.

          Bruno P. Kinoshita added a comment - Feature coming in the next release. Let's start simple, with a checkbox that allows you to show only "NOT OK". In a 2.0 or further, it would be great if we had a way to filter by status and directive. For example, NOT OK and TODO. You will have to trigger a new build to apply the filter (part of this happens in the server side). But we can also re-think in the future, in a client-side solution. Though if we want to support a lot of tests, that's probably not a good idea. Thanks for reporting, and sorry for taking so long to reply. Give it a try, let us know if that worked, and let's continue refining the code. The next releases are bugfixes, but we will have a 2.0, probably this year, focused in performance and polish the code.

          Marking as closed.

          Bruno P. Kinoshita added a comment - Marking as closed.

            kinow Bruno P. Kinoshita
            real Real ONeil
            Votes:
            2 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: