Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-28599

Inconsistent behavior of collect

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Component/s: pipeline
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Jenkins 1.613
      CentOS 6.5
      Installed from Jenkins Repo
      Java x64 1.7.0_75
    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      If this is not the right place, apologies.
      I'm finding an inconsistency when running this code in Jenkins' Script Console (url /script) and in a workflow job:

      bla=['a','b']
blu=bla.collect { it + 'c' }
println bla + bla.class.getCanonicalName()
println blu + blu.class.getCanonicalName()

      When running from the console:

      [a, b, java.util.ArrayList]
[ac, bc, java.util.ArrayList]

      When running from the job:

      Started by user BackSlasher
Running: Print Message
[a, b, java.util.ArrayList]
Running: Print Message
acjava.lang.String
Running: End of Workflow
Finished: SUCCESS

      The collect method seems to operate only on the first object. Didn't find any obvious reason to why - the Groovy library seems the same.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is related to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JENKINS-26481 Mishandling of binary methods accepting Closure

          • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Resolved

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            valones Flávio Augusto Valones added a comment -

            The workflow plugin have trouble with some closures, see JENKINS-26481 for more details.

            Show
            valones Flávio Augusto Valones added a comment - The workflow plugin have trouble with some closures, see JENKINS-26481 for more details.
            Hide
            Permalink
            backslasher Back Slasher added a comment -

            Seems relevant, thanks!

            Show
            backslasher Back Slasher added a comment - Seems relevant, thanks!

              People

              Assignee:
              jglick Jesse Glick
              Reporter:
              backslasher Back Slasher
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: