Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open (View Workflow)
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
Description
I issue the following tap file:
1..77 ok 1 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/BlockRandII_fast_asm.pp ok 2 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/UL_searcherFindPeaks_fp_fp4014.pp ok 3 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/VDSL2Interleaver_process8x16ICWs_NSB_big.pp ok 4 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/abi-clobber.asm ok 5 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/abi-clobber1.asm ok 6 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/abi1.asm ok 7 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/abi2.asm ok 8 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/abi3.asm ok 9 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/alloc1.asm ok 10 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/branches1.asm ok 11 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/branches2.asm ok 12 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/crc_output_fp_fp4014.pp ok 13 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/dotprod.asm ok 14 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/empty-use.asm ok 15 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/ilv4x16_fp4014.pp ok 16 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/infinite-recursion1.asm ok 17 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/infinite-recursion2.asm ok 18 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/invalid-pair1.asm ok 19 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/invalid-pair2.asm ok 20 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/jump-write-conflict.asm ok 21 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/ldpl.pp not ok 22 - [ASM] /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/memset64_fp4014.vs # SKIP ok 23 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/memset64_fp4014_parse-fail.vs ok 24 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/msr.vs ok 25 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/pair-unused.asm ok 26 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/scramble-crc-encode_fp_fp4014.pp ok 27 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/sieve_fp2012_fp4014.pp ok 28 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/simple.asm ok 29 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/td_deconstloop_dcache.pp ok 30 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/td_deconstloop_dmem.pp ok 31 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-1.asm ok 32 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-2.asm ok 33 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-3.asm ok 34 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-4.asm ok 35 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-5.asm ok 36 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-6.asm ok 37 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-7.asm ok 38 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tempreg-8.asm ok 39 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-callret1.asm ok 40 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-callret2.asm ok 41 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-label1.asm ok 42 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-label2.asm ok 43 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-p0.asm ok 44 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-reg-flavours.asm ok 45 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-set1.asm ok 46 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/test-use_equ-flavours.asm ok 47 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/ticked-pair.asm ok 48 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/ticked-pair1.asm ok 49 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/ticked.asm ok 50 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3273.asm ok 51 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3277.asm ok 52 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3278.asm ok 53 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3280.asm ok 54 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3281.asm ok 55 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3288.asm ok 56 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3292.asm ok 57 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3292_1.asm ok 58 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3300.asm ok 59 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3300_1.asm ok 60 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3307.asm ok 61 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3310.asm ok 62 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3316.asm ok 63 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3316_1.asm not ok 64 - [RALL] /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3318.asm # SKIP ok 65 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3321.asm ok 66 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3321_1.pp ok 67 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/tlfp-3321_2.pp ok 68 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/unused-conflict.asm ok 69 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/updates1.asm ok 70 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/vlr-ticked.asm ok 71 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/vlr1.asm ok 72 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/vlr2.asm ok 73 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/vlr_ticked-updated.asm ok 74 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/writes-lives.asm ok 75 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/xFFTh_fp_fp4014.pp ok 76 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/xFFTh_radix4_fp4014.pp ok 77 - /projects/firepath_tools/jenkins/jobs/rall/workspace/rallng/tests/asm/fp4014/xFFTw32_fp_fp4014.pp
Tests 22 and 64 should be marked as skipped but they are not. They just show up as failed.
Attachments
Activity
Mathieu Clabaut
added a comment - Hello,
May I ask to reopen this issue for several reasons.
- Strictly speaking the TAP specification says nothing about the test being marked ok or not ok:
If the directive starts with # SKIP, the test is counted as having been skipped. If the whole test file succeeds, the count of skipped tests is included in the generated output. The harness should report the text after # SKIP\S*\s+ as a reason for skipping.
The grey box is only an example, and do not preclude the user to put other reasons than the one show, or other test result.
Note that I'm not the only one to understand this (see https://github.com/scottcorgan/tap-out/issues/16 for example) - But most importantly, it seems dangerous to me to put a test ok by default when skipped. If for a reason or another, there is a bug in the script that prevent to output the SKIP comment (case just met this afternoon), then the test is marked as ok, and no one will notice that something is wrong.
Mathieu Clabaut
added a comment - Hello,
May I ask to reopen this issue for several reasons.
Strictly speaking the TAP specification says nothing about the test being marked ok or not ok :
If the directive starts with # SKIP, the test is counted as having been skipped. If the whole test file succeeds, the count of skipped tests is included in the generated output. The harness should report the text after # SKIP\S*\s+ as a reason for skipping.
The grey box is only an example, and do not preclude the user to put other reasons than the one show, or other test result.
Note that I'm not the only one to understand this (see https://github.com/scottcorgan/tap-out/issues/16 for example)
But most importantly, it seems dangerous to me to put a test ok by default when skipped. If for a reason or another, there is a bug in the script that prevent to output the SKIP comment (case just met this afternoon), then the test is marked as ok , and no one will notice that something is wrong.
Mathieu Clabaut
added a comment - See my last comment about the reason of reopening.
I hope it is not considered has being rude to reopen.
Mathieu Clabaut
added a comment - See my last comment about the reason of reopening.
I hope it is not considered has being rude to reopen. Jenkins supports three states PASS, FAIL, SKIP.
TAP output should be parsed into those boxes.
Then, Jenkins allows you to decide whether to mark the build Successful, Failed or Unstable based on the test state totals.
This gives greatest utility to users, and supports both of our use cases.
If you really cannot deal with it, raise a separate issue allowing the parsing of skipped tests to be configurable, but don't change the default.
matclab reopening issues is always fine. Thanks for commenting here and sharing your view on the issue.
jameshowe agreed.
I believe we decided to stick with #SKIP tests one way that won't support all cases, as Mathieu's. As James correctly pointed, keeping backward compatibility, and trying to be concise is important.
So here's a proposed solution:
1. add an option under Advanced "Skip tests will be marked as" which has a combo box
2. the combo box will have the values "Failure", "Success", "Skipped", "TAP Test Result status", where the last one means, 'whatever is defined in the test result'. So ok # SKIP will result in Success, not ok # SKIP will result in Failure
3. the default value for this combo box will be "TAP Test Result status", which seems to be the current behavior
4. a help file will be added, as well as unit tests
Any objections? 
This is more for cleaning and organizing the issues. Normally the issues are reported, a developer here will check and move to another status, and when I cut the release I move all the issues marked as resolved to closed, and create the release notes.
ps: in cases where issues are marked as not a issue, won't fix, cannot reproduce, having the release number helps me to know which version was used while investigating the problem - though I could add a comment somewhere when it is not included by the issue reporter