Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-25369

DNS multicast error messages

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Jenkins 2.178

    Description

      I've seen these error messages in my console output, which comes from jmdns.

      The level of the logging messages should be toned down significantly given that these are from a relatively minor feature in Jenkins.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            I've been doing some research here and updating the library seems to fix the problem. At least is a starting point. 

            As I can see, the library was forked just because we want to use an abort method instead of the close method provided by jmdns. Moving the logic of this abort method to the core, probably we can put aside the fork and use the library instead, so any update would be easier. Opening a PR soon.

            fcojfernandez Francisco Fernández added a comment - I've been doing some research here and updating the library seems to fix the problem. At least is a starting point.  As I can see, the library was forked just because we want to use an abort  method instead of the close method provided by jmdns. Moving the logic of this abort method to the core, probably we can put aside the fork and use the library instead, so any update would be easier. Opening a PR soon.
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            It was released in Jenkins 2.178, but we do not think backporting is justified for now

            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - It was released in Jenkins 2.178, but we do not think backporting is justified for now
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            LTS backporting comment: let's do more testing before considering backporting

            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - LTS backporting comment: let's do more testing before considering backporting
            olivergondza Oliver Gondža added a comment - - edited oleg_nenashev , fcojfernandez , have you gain enough confidence in backporting https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4021 and https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4037  into .2?

            I am rejecting the backport to be added to 2.176 LTS line. Will appear in the next one naturally.

            olivergondza Oliver Gondža added a comment - I am rejecting the backport to be added to 2.176 LTS line. Will appear in the next one naturally.

            People

              fcojfernandez Francisco Fernández
              uday Udaypal Aarkoti
              Votes:
              12 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              24 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: