Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-28391

Allow excluding files from "Manual synchronization includes"

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      Not all plugins use the same naming convention for their xml configuration file. Thus an include filter such as 

      hudson.*xml jenkins*xml *plugin*.xml

      doesn't capture all plugin configurations. But if one uses *xml then one also includes credentials.xml. If one lists all plugin xml then one needs to update the filter when installing new plugins. It would be nice if one could specify both an include and an exclude filter so that one could specify:
      include: *xml
      exclude: credentials.xml

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          duplicates

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. JENKINS-18187 scm-sync-configuration: Posibility to exclude files/directories from syncing

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Open
          is related to

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. JENKINS-19659 Allow to deactivate bundled scm sync config strategies

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Open

          Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            fcamblor Frédéric Camblor added a comment -

            Duplicate of JENKINS-18187

            A more generic solution has been proposed in JENKINS-19659. What do you think about it ?
            Are you ok to close current issue ?

            fcamblor Frédéric Camblor added a comment - Duplicate of JENKINS-18187 A more generic solution has been proposed in JENKINS-19659 . What do you think about it ? Are you ok to close current issue ?
            rschulz Roland Schulz added a comment -

            I don't think 19659 addresses my issue. I do agree this is a duplicate of 18187. Sorry! I think it is probably better to have the discussion in one place. So I'll put my reason why I think this is a good feature there and this should be closed as duplicate.

            rschulz Roland Schulz added a comment - I don't think 19659 addresses my issue. I do agree this is a duplicate of 18187. Sorry! I think it is probably better to have the discussion in one place. So I'll put my reason why I think this is a good feature there and this should be closed as duplicate.
            fcamblor Frédéric Camblor added a comment -

            Fine, thanks

            fcamblor Frédéric Camblor added a comment - Fine, thanks

            People

              fcamblor Frédéric Camblor
              rschulz Roland Schulz
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: