Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-32545

failFast has no effect when withCredentials is used

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      When wrapping a long-running step inside a parallel branch in withCredentials, failFast will no longer result in the long-running branch being terminated. I'll use the failFast example at https://github.com/kmadel/jenkins-workflow-examples/blob/master/failFast.groovy:

      This works
      stage 'parallel with failFast'
def error;
node {
  try {
    parallel(
      b: { error 'died' },
      // make sure this branch takes longer than b
      a: { sleep 35; writeFile text: '', file: 'a.done' },
      failFast: true
    )
  } catch (e) {
    error = e.toString()
  }
}
stage 'failFast Success with error'
echo "error: ${error}"

      That works fine. However, if I try to use withCredentials, the longer-running a branch continues normal execution, and the build only fails once it's done:

      This doesn't work
      stage 'parallel with failFast'
def error;
node {
  try {
    parallel(
      b: { error 'died' },
      // make sure this branch takes longer than b
      a: { withCredentials([[$class: 'StringBinding', credentialsId: 'some-credentials-id-here', variable: 'SOME_ENV_VARIABLE']]) {
        sleep 35
        writeFile text: '', file: 'a.done'
      } },
      failFast: true
    )
  } catch (e) {
    error = e.toString()
  }
}
stage 'failFast Success with error'
echo "error: ${error}"

      Any ideas what's going on here, or thoughts on a workaround?

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          duplicates

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JENKINS-34637 pipeline DSL: timeout() does not work if withEnv() is enclosed

          • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Resolved

          Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            No idea offhand, would have to see if reproducible in a functional test.

            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - No idea offhand, would have to see if reproducible in a functional test.
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            Probably the same as JENKINS-34637, so please retest with that update and reopen if the problem persists.

            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - Probably the same as JENKINS-34637 , so please retest with that update and reopen if the problem persists.

            People

              jglick Jesse Glick
              wilkystyle Mike Wilkerson
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: