Besides Blue Ocean, which I don't have, my version for git-related plugins are the same as yours except for github branch source plugin. I have 2.0.3

I'm stumped. I don't really don't know what I'm doing wrong....

what versions of credentials and ssh credentials. what version of java is the master running on

java: 1.8.0
credentials: 2.1.11
ssh credentials: 1.13

Very strange

Something is definitely broken since this used to work last week Feb 10th for standalone pipelines (I never got multibranch pipeline working with my setup)

I should point out that the GitHub Branch Source is auto-wired to the webhook, so when you get that working you should not need a "Periodically unless otherwise ran" that is more often than once per hour... once per day being more likely (that setting should be seen as 'If an event from GitHub was not delivered, how long can I wait without it being detected'... most people are probably 1 week as typically event delivery is very reliable and there are usually follow-up events anyway)

So, I may have chimed in on a thread where Ralph A's environment is centered on multi-branch and Pipeline Plugin usage. I'm not using Pipelines (yet; more of a team choice for that) and mine was a case specific to push event triggers from GitHub affecting branches with Multiple SCM Plugin, and the triggering of multiple branch build jobs. I isolated my situation (and wrote up a ticket here: Jenkins builds all jobs when user intends for one) around the behavior I saw. I'm open to understanding that we might have an ill-suited dev process for the way Jenkins functions with is SCM-push-trigger logic, but it seems to me that when a user commits a change to a branch, only that branch job should build, and not others (regardless if their GitHub state is a mismatch according to Jenkins).

The "workaround" is that we use a single GitHub repo SCM with a submodule of the other GitHub repo that's needed (our jobs only had 2 repos). But since that 2nd repo is only needed for CI (and not dev work), this was an acceptable alternative.

I've given up and changed my previous workflow, as per Stephen's sugggestion. I would also like to apologize for my previous comment that is misleading and not entirely correct.

I originally had a working freestyle project that did everything that I needed but, in order to satisfy our developers' need, we opted to switch it to a pipeline project in order to take advantage of Jenkinsfile. My memory got mixed up with what is working and what is half-working since I tested Jenkinsfile in a pipeline project in chunks so I remember the situation incorrectly.

That aside, I would like to now focus on building a standalone pipeline project (I still could not get multibranch to work with Github webhooks) but I still need to get the polling ignore commits to function. As per markewaite "[t]here is already a separate bug report that pipeline polling does not ignore commits from specific users". Could you please comment on the issue number so I know which one to track? I found a few issue related to polling ignore commits/users but I am unsure which one you are specifically referring to

Cheers!

Refer to JENKINS-36195 or JENKINS-35988 for the pipeline specific polling bug report.

How github plugin works is written in docs. Screenshot contains wrong git configuration that unrelated to github-plugin. 

Please go to user mail list with discussing user workflows and branch-source/org-folder etc