Age does not look correct for new issues when compared with a reference build

This issue is archived. You can view it, but you can't modify it. Learn more

XMLWordPrintable

    • 5.0.0 (analysis-model and warnings-ng)

      Our project is configured with a reference build, the console shows that build has been used for comparison, however the age for the issues are always shown as 1 even though they were flagged in a previous build.

      The console log for build #183 shows:

      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] Using reference build 'XXXX #165' to compute new, fixed, and outstanding issues
      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] Issues delta (vs. reference build): outstanding: 25055, new: 427, fixed: 517
      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] Evaluating quality gates
      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] -> WARNING - Total number of issues (Severity High): 291 - Quality Gate: 270
      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] -> WARNING - Number of new issues: 427 - Quality Gate: 1
      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] -> Some quality gates have been missed: overall result is WARNING
      *05:01:38* [Static Analysis] Health report is disabled - skipping
      *05:01:40* [Static Analysis] Created analysis result for 25482 issues (found 427 new issues, fixed 517 issues)
      
      

      Some of these issues have been introduced in build #166, but when I look at build #183, these same lines are shown with the Age of 1, shouldn't have an age relevant to the build it was first seen in?

            Assignee:
            Ulli Hafner
            Reporter:
            Julie Shamji
            Archiver:
            Jenkins Service Account

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Archived: