• Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Blocker Blocker
    • core
    • None

      A very basic pom as project, and a build goal: clean

      Parsing POMs
      ERROR: Processing failed due to a bug in the code. Please report this to users@hudson.dev.java.net
      java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: vfszip:/etc/jboss/jboss-6.0.0.M1/server/hudson/deploy/hudson-1.347.war/WEB-INF/lib/remoting-1.347.jar/hudson/remoting/Launcher.class - vfszip:/etc/jboss/jboss-6.0.0.M1/server/hudson/deploy/hudson-1.347.war/WEB-INF/lib/remoting-1.347.jar/hudson/remoting/Launcher.class
      at hudson.remoting.Which.jarFile(Which.java:157)
      at hudson.maven.MavenProcessFactory$GetRemotingJar.call(MavenProcessFactory.java:370)
      at hudson.maven.MavenProcessFactory$GetRemotingJar.call(MavenProcessFactory.java:368)
      at hudson.remoting.LocalChannel.call(LocalChannel.java:45)
      at hudson.maven.MavenProcessFactory.buildMavenCmdLine(MavenProcessFactory.java:277)
      at hudson.maven.MavenProcessFactory.newProcess(MavenProcessFactory.java:196)
      at hudson.maven.ProcessCache.get(ProcessCache.java:231)
      at hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild$RunnerImpl.doRun(MavenModuleSetBuild.java:455)
      at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.run(AbstractBuild.java:416)
      at hudson.model.Run.run(Run.java:1198)
      at hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild.run(MavenModuleSetBuild.java:304)
      at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88)
      at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:122)

          [JENKINS-5722] Hudson fails to execute

          kutzi added a comment -

          Looks more like a core issue and related to JENKINS-5922

          kutzi added a comment - Looks more like a core issue and related to JENKINS-5922

          kutzi added a comment -

          Can you confirm that this is still an issue after the fix for JENKINS-5922 ?

          kutzi added a comment - Can you confirm that this is still an issue after the fix for JENKINS-5922 ?

          kutzi added a comment -

          Closing, because it's probably a duplicate of JENKINS-5922

          kutzi added a comment - Closing, because it's probably a duplicate of JENKINS-5922

            Unassigned Unassigned
            technolords technolords
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: