Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-58595

rssAll feed doesn't have published field after 2.176.2 upgrade

    • 2.190

      After 2.176.2 upgrade rssAll feed doesn't provision published field with a datetime str as it used, rolling back to 2.176.1 fix the problem

          [JENKINS-58595] rssAll feed doesn't have published field after 2.176.2 upgrade

          We are having the same issue. The xml-tags published and updated are missing timestamps after the update: 

           

          <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

          [...]

          <published/><updated/>

          [...]

          This is a problem for us, because we are using the RSS feeds to find failed builds and to send informational mails, etc. A fix would be much appreciated.

          René Waldmann added a comment - We are having the same issue. The xml-tags published and updated are missing timestamps after the update:    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> [...] <published/><updated/> [...] This is a problem for us, because we are using the RSS feeds to find failed builds and to send informational mails, etc. A fix would be much appreciated.

          Daniel Beck added a comment -

          jvz Regression due to SECURITY-534, we removed the "h" variable from rss20.jelly and atom.jelly.

          Could you review all views where you did that and restore it in any that use "h"?

          Daniel Beck added a comment - jvz Regression due to SECURITY-534, we removed the "h" variable from rss20.jelly and atom.jelly. Could you review all views where you did that and restore it in any that use "h"?

          Matt Sicker added a comment -

          Added PR to fix this for both RSS and Atom. There were no other views that removed the h variable in SECURITY-534.

          Matt Sicker added a comment - Added PR to fix this for both RSS and Atom. There were no other views that removed the h variable in SECURITY-534.

          Uwe Schindler added a comment - - edited

          This not only broke the dates, but also the <link> elements are missing the entry path. It only shows Jenkin's base URLs, but the URL paths are missing. After looking at the PR, I think that should be fixed, too.

          Uwe Schindler added a comment - - edited This not only broke the dates, but also the <link> elements are missing the entry path. It only shows Jenkin's base URLs, but the URL paths are missing. After looking at the PR, I think that should be fixed, too.

          Uwe Schindler added a comment -

          Is there any schedule for the fix? Apache Lucene's analysis of build failures is affected by this issue:

          https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f6c2073a47b1d1cac9549129a522e439d23f598407a7d4ebb5c01036@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E

          Uwe Schindler added a comment - Is there any schedule for the fix? Apache Lucene's analysis of build failures is affected by this issue: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f6c2073a47b1d1cac9549129a522e439d23f598407a7d4ebb5c01036@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E

            jvz Matt Sicker
            adomenech Albert Domenech
            Votes:
            2 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: