Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-60514

Message: "Publish Micro Focus tests result is waiting for a checkpoint on LR_AFF #42"

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Critical Critical
    • Jenkins version: 2.190.3
      Microfocus Application Automation Tools v5.9
      Jenkins slave: Windows 10; Jenkins Master: Linux
      Build-step: Execute Micro Focus tests from file system

      We are using a windows slave in order to execute LoadRunner Jenkins jobs. Those jobs do not depends on each other. However jobs that started before the other and last longer  preventing later jobs to be published and finished. The later jobs are waiting on queue and issue message in their console that they are waiting to the earlier job.  I.e. "Publish Micro Focus tests result is waiting for a checkpoint on LR_AFF #42" (LR_AFF - is our LoadRunner Jenkins job name). In some cases we are coming and because that the earlier job stack the other jobs waits  for days (during weekend). Please fix it.

          [JENKINS-60514] Message: "Publish Micro Focus tests result is waiting for a checkpoint on LR_AFF #42"

          I managed to reproduce the issue. The reason "Publish Micro Focus tests results" is waiting is due to the following line: https://github.com/jenkinsci/hpe-application-automation-tools-plugin/blob/latest/src/main/java/com/microfocus/application/automation/tools/results/RunResultRecorder.java#L1455. However, changing the mode causes other issues, thus the current workflow was intended. I continue to investigate if it is possible to change the mode.

          Rolando-Mihai Vlad added a comment - I managed to reproduce the issue. The reason "Publish Micro Focus tests results" is waiting is due to the following line:  https://github.com/jenkinsci/hpe-application-automation-tools-plugin/blob/latest/src/main/java/com/microfocus/application/automation/tools/results/RunResultRecorder.java#L1455 . However, changing the mode causes other issues, thus the current workflow was intended. I continue to investigate if it is possible to change the mode.

          Hello Yaniv Katz,

          I apologise for the delayed response due to holidays. I performed some code changes and you will find the modified .hpi at: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/HPEbot/hp-application-automation-tools-plugin/builds/30019176/artifacts.

          Please let me know if you encounter any issues.

           

          Regards,

          Rolando

          Rolando-Mihai Vlad added a comment - Hello Yaniv Katz, I apologise for the delayed response due to holidays. I performed some code changes and you will find the modified .hpi at:  https://ci.appveyor.com/project/HPEbot/hp-application-automation-tools-plugin/builds/30019176/artifacts. Please let me know if you encounter any issues.   Regards, Rolando

          Yaniv Katz added a comment -

          Hello Rolando,

           

          Thanks! However I'm not expert to Jenkins (use sys admin). Does it contains the new version 6.0? 

           

          Regards, Yaniv

          Yaniv Katz added a comment - Hello Rolando,   Thanks! However I'm not expert to Jenkins (use sys admin). Does it contains the new version 6.0?    Regards, Yaniv

          It contains 6.0 and unreleased changes.

          Rolando-Mihai Vlad added a comment - It contains 6.0 and unreleased changes.

          Yaniv Katz added a comment -

          Hello Rolando,

           

          Our DevOps Manager prefer to install an official build. When will it be part of official build?

           

          Thanks,

          Yaniv

          Yaniv Katz added a comment - Hello Rolando,   Our DevOps Manager prefer to install an official build. When will it be part of official build?   Thanks, Yaniv

          Hello Yaniv,

          It will be part of next release (around February).

           

          Regards,

          Rolando

          Rolando-Mihai Vlad added a comment - Hello Yaniv, It will be part of next release (around February).   Regards, Rolando

          Yaniv Katz added a comment -

          Hi rolandomihaivlad -  Our DevOps prefer formal release. Did we had formal release? I think the one I see 6.0 is before February and not contain the build. Is it right?

          Yaniv Katz added a comment - Hi rolandomihaivlad -  Our DevOps prefer formal release. Did we had formal release? I think the one I see 6.0 is before February and not contain the build. Is it right?

          Hello Yaniv,

          From what I see 6.1 and 6.2 should contain the fix.

           

          Regards,

          Rolando

          Rolando-Mihai Vlad added a comment - Hello Yaniv, From what I see 6.1 and 6.2 should contain the fix.   Regards, Rolando

          Yaniv Katz added a comment -

          Hi Rolando,

          When 6.1 or 6.2 will be GA?

          Thanks,
          Yaniv

          Yaniv Katz added a comment - Hi Rolando, When 6.1 or 6.2 will be GA? Thanks, Yaniv

          Hello,

          They are already GA. Currently, 6.3 is in beta.

           

          Regards,

          Rolando

          Rolando-Mihai Vlad added a comment - Hello, They are already GA. Currently, 6.3 is in beta.   Regards, Rolando

            rolandomihaivlad Rolando-Mihai Vlad
            yanivka7 Yaniv Katz
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: