Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-62400

Red Hat repo definition needs improvements

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Improvement Improvement
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • packaging
    • Jenkins 2.237 Red Hat rpm repository

      Jason Pyeron noted that that the Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Fedora, Amazon Linux, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.

          [JENKINS-62400] Red Hat repo definition needs improvements

          Mark Waite created issue -
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Description Original: Jason Pyeron noted that that the [Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-users/n6-8JfWFw8M/uAKo_s_8AQAJ]. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.

          		 New: Jason Pyeron noted that that the [Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-users/n6-8JfWFw8M/uAKo_s_8AQAJ]. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Description Original: Jason Pyeron noted that that the [Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-users/n6-8JfWFw8M/uAKo_s_8AQAJ]. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.
          		 New: Jason Pyeron noted that that the [Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-users/n6-8JfWFw8M/uAKo_s_8AQAJ]. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Amazon Linux, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Description Original: Jason Pyeron noted that that the [Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-users/n6-8JfWFw8M/uAKo_s_8AQAJ]. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Amazon Linux, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.
          		 New: Jason Pyeron noted that that the [Red Hat rpm repository definition has some inconsistencies|https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-users/n6-8JfWFw8M/uAKo_s_8AQAJ]. Fixing those inconsistencies will make the packages better for Red Hat, CentOS, Fedora, Amazon Linux, Oracle Linux, and other administrators of systems that install from that rpm repositories.

          Andres Salcedo added a comment -

          Hi. How could I help with this one?

          Andres Salcedo added a comment - Hi. How could I help with this one?

          Tim Jacomb added a comment - - edited

          The repo is https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging for most of the code

          Some of it is in https://github.com/jenkins-infra/release

          Note: our current main branch is INFRA-910-core-release-automation, submit changes against that, we plan to merge it to master in 1-2 weeks.

          I've heard a couple of issues from people, the repo isn't gpg signed, and init d scripts are used instead of systemd.

          Tim Jacomb added a comment - - edited The repo is https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging for most of the code Some of it is in https://github.com/jenkins-infra/release Note: our current main branch is INFRA-910-core-release-automation, submit changes against that, we plan to merge it to master in 1-2 weeks. I've heard a couple of issues from people, the repo isn't gpg signed, and init d scripts are used instead of systemd.
          Stefano Canepa made changes -
          Assignee New: Stefano Canepa [ scanepa ]
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Assignee Original: Stefano Canepa [ scanepa ]

          Mark Waite added a comment -

          Closing this issue because the work is happening in https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging and issues are being tracked in https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/issues

          Significant progress was made when the installer transitioned from System V init to systemd. Work is currently in progress to make further improvements in PR 409 - https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/pull/409

          Mark Waite added a comment - Closing this issue because the work is happening in https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging and issues are being tracked in https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/issues Significant progress was made when the installer transitioned from System V init to systemd. Work is currently in progress to make further improvements in PR 409 - https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/pull/409
          Mark Waite made changes -
          Resolution New: Duplicate [ 3 ]
          Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]

            Unassigned Unassigned
            markewaite Mark Waite
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: