Considering an run that is facing an issue (run over the timeout threshold for example), we are facing the below issue for the unit test foo : 

• Run 0 : Test foo Passed
• Run 1 : Test foo failing, Age 1
• Run 2 : Test foo failing, age 2
• Run 3 : Test foo failing, age 3
• Run 4 : Run over the threshold (10mins), unit test foo has not beed played, 
• Run 5 : Test foo failing, age 1
• Run 6 : test foo failing age 2

We wrongly believe that the run 5 is responsible for making the unit test failing.

I believe we should display on run 6 an age of 6.

This would requiere a paradigm shift from : Age is the run where status = Failed and Previous Run != Failed to 
Age is the run where status = Failed and Previous run = Passed. 
Or When a run is aborted and a status is different then Pass, we go through the previous run