danielbeck I see that this is not listed as an LTS candidate. Since it was included in 2.429, it would be eligible for backport to 2.426.1 or 2.426.2. Would you like it considered as an LTS candidate?
Mark Waite
added a comment - danielbeck I see that this is not listed as an LTS candidate. Since it was included in 2.429, it would be eligible for backport to 2.426.1 or 2.426.2. Would you like it considered as an LTS candidate?
danielbeck I see that this is not listed as an LTS candidate. Since it was included in 2.429, it would be eligible for backport to 2.426.1 or 2.426.2. Would you like it considered as an LTS candidate?