• Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • core
    • Jenkins 1.580.1 (LTS), Linux, Firefox 24.8

      With the new design the build history panel on the left of each job is broken. It's rendered too small so that build date and build size are wrapped which looks darn-ugly. Funnily, if I make the browser window smaller it suddenly looks correct (see attached screenshots).
      Apart from that the new design seems to needs considerably more space, probably because the font size is larger (or because of the changed font). This is a drawback in my opinion.

        1. broken_layout.png
          broken_layout.png
          183 kB
        2. duration_column_too_small.png
          duration_column_too_small.png
          7 kB
        3. duration_column_too_small.png
          duration_column_too_small.png
          7 kB
        4. ok.png
          ok.png
          199 kB

          [JENKINS-25390] New design breaks build history layout

          Another issue: the duration column in the tests view is also too small, see screenshot. It may be due to the german translation but still this was not problem before.

          Thorsten Meinl added a comment - Another issue: the duration column in the tests view is also too small, see screenshot. It may be due to the german translation but still this was not problem before.

          Another issue: the duration column in the tests view is also too small, see screenshot. It may be due to the german translation but still this was not problem before.

          Thorsten Meinl added a comment - Another issue: the duration column in the tests view is also too small, see screenshot. It may be due to the german translation but still this was not problem before.

          Daniel Beck added a comment -

          Disk Usage plugin's size badge is much larger than any badges shipped with core, so that's not surprising.

          Daniel Beck added a comment - Disk Usage plugin's size badge is much larger than any badges shipped with core, so that's not surprising.

          Daniel Beck added a comment -

          Duplicates JENKINS-25393 (while that is newer, it also has the link to JENKINS-25381)

          Daniel Beck added a comment - Duplicates JENKINS-25393 (while that is newer, it also has the link to JENKINS-25381 )

          This also affects a few others parts of the GUI, e.g. the JUnit results page or the build processor panel on the front page. In some cases the layout gets better if you make the browser windows smaller. Should I open separate issues for each of them?

          Thorsten Meinl added a comment - This also affects a few others parts of the GUI, e.g. the JUnit results page or the build processor panel on the front page. In some cases the layout gets better if you make the browser windows smaller. Should I open separate issues for each of them?

          Tom FENNELLY added a comment -

          Please see https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1470. Try it if you can and provide feedback.

          Tom FENNELLY added a comment - Please see https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/1470 . Try it if you can and provide feedback.

          Daniel Beck added a comment -

          tfennelly: Not logged into GitHub right now, so commenting here: Please point users on GitHub to the PR's build at e.g. https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job/core/job/jenkins-core/1730/artifact/war/target/ so they can simply download + test the change (important: not in production!) with different inputs. That guy is clearly confused about what he should do with the PR.

          Daniel Beck added a comment - tfennelly : Not logged into GitHub right now, so commenting here: Please point users on GitHub to the PR's build at e.g. https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job/core/job/jenkins-core/1730/artifact/war/target/ so they can simply download + test the change (important: not in production!) with different inputs. That guy is clearly confused about what he should do with the PR.

          Tom FENNELLY added a comment -

          @Daniel: good point. Comments added to PR.

          Tom FENNELLY added a comment - @Daniel: good point. Comments added to PR.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            sithmein Thorsten Meinl
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: