Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-67395

Build status icon sizes smaller due to the new table styles (regression in 2.321)

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • core

      The build status icons are smaller than expected (S=16/M=24/L=32) after the jenkins tables UI rework done in https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5851

       Before:

      After:

        1. after.png
          after.png
          30 kB
        2. before.png
          before.png
          35 kB
        3. image-2021-12-17-14-08-21-510.png
          image-2021-12-17-14-08-21-510.png
          155 kB
        4. image-2021-12-17-14-10-08-371.png
          image-2021-12-17-14-10-08-371.png
          135 kB

          [JENKINS-67395] Build status icon sizes smaller due to the new table styles (regression in 2.321)

          Tim Jacomb added a comment -

          Tim Jacomb added a comment - Cc janfaracik

          Basil Crow added a comment -

          I can confirm that the behavior changed with JENKINS-68229. I have attached before and after screenshots. Not sure if this is an intentional aesthetic choice or an unintentional regression. Suggest bringing this up with UX SIG to confirm the change in icon size. If an intentional aesthetic choice, this ticket can be closed. If an unintentional regression, this ticket should remain open.

          Basil Crow added a comment - I can confirm that the behavior changed with JENKINS-68229 . I have attached before and after screenshots. Not sure if this is an intentional aesthetic choice or an unintentional regression. Suggest bringing this up with UX SIG to confirm the change in icon size. If an intentional aesthetic choice, this ticket can be closed. If an unintentional regression, this ticket should remain open.

          Basil Crow added a comment -

          In particular, the size changed from 32px to 24px

          Basil Crow added a comment - In particular, the size changed from 32px to 24px

          This looks like an intentional design choice to me. Restoring the size from 24px to 32px looks odd to me in the first place, because I got too used to the current layout, however, I agree that the "large" view could indeed be a bit larger, as intended.

          Any opinions janfaracik?

          Alexander Brandes added a comment - This looks like an intentional design choice to me. Restoring the size from 24px to 32px looks odd to me in the first place, because I got too used to the current layout, however, I agree that the "large" view could indeed be a bit larger, as intended. Any opinions janfaracik ?

          Jan Faracik added a comment -

          Yeah it's an intentional design decision, I think overall the table could be tightened up a touch to lessen this.

          Jan Faracik added a comment - Yeah it's an intentional design decision, I think overall the table could be tightened up a touch to lessen this.

            janfaracik Jan Faracik
            didiez Diego Díez
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: