Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-25053

Record process ID of spawned process on Windows

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      Follow-up to JENKINS-22249 for WindowsBatchScript.

      http://serverfault.com/questions/126502/how-to-get-own-process-pid-from-the-command-prompt-in-windows/126643#126643 is the only thing I can find for Windows. Ugly!

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is related to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JENKINS-22249 Record process ID of spawned process

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved
          relates to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JENKINS-25503 Use setsid instead of nohup

          • Major - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JENKINS-42166 ProcessLiveness.workingLaunchers heuristic is flaky

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Resolved
          links to

          Web Link PR 30

          Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            ganthore Mark Austin added a comment -

            With some modifications, perhaps using the process of capturing the PID from the attached bat script could help us track things better.

            AFAIK, the wmic command has been available for quite some time, should go as far back as windows xp and server 2003, so I doubt we'd cause noticeable breakage by calling out to this tool.

            ganthore Mark Austin added a comment - With some modifications, perhaps using the process of capturing the PID from the attached bat script could help us track things better. AFAIK, the wmic command has been available for quite some time, should go as far back as windows xp and server 2003, so I doubt we'd cause noticeable breakage by calling out to this tool.
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            As per JENKINS-47791, do not do this; rather port the log liveness check.

            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - As per  JENKINS-47791 , do not do this; rather port the log liveness check.
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            I suspect the new wrapper written by carroll for JENKINS-25503 renders this obsolete.

            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - I suspect the new wrapper written by carroll for JENKINS-25503 renders this obsolete.

            People

              jglick Jesse Glick
              jglick Jesse Glick
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: